Hi,
I'd love to get peoples thoughts on ASD diagnosis. We went to see our ‘classic’ paediatrician yesterday for a check up. He naturally doesn't acknowledge biomedical since it hasn't been scientifically proven, although is interested in our overall progress. The meeting was fine, however it got us thinking a bit. In our case, our little boy is quite mild / high functioning – he has an ASD diagnosis, but it's much more related to speech & social delay that repetitive behaviours. The diagnosis was a little bit black box in a way, not based on much in the way of detailed analysis, but more on general discussion on behaviour etc. Plus, it seems the diagnosis becomes more based on historical behaviours, rather than how he’s behaving now, especially given we’ve seen so much positive impact from diet & biomedical changes (we’ve been working with Libby Weaver & Debbie Fewtrell). We’ve still got lots of progress to make, but we’ve seen significant change and hope for more to come.
So, I have a couple of questions. Firstly, for those with young children who are improving lots over time as a result of biomed etc, how are you dealing with a diagnosis? Is anyone changing or updating this over time? Or do we just stick with the original diagnosis, which becomes less relevant over time & focus on real life behaviour? I’m trying to get my head around this. Also, does anyone have any particular paediatricians you recommend for diagnosis in the Auckland area? I'd really appreciate everyone's thoughts.
Cheers,
Megan
